Page 1 of 2

Hone your skills

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 1:53 am
by entirelyturbo
Alright Legacy geeks, what's wrong with this?

http://www.batfa.com/offerofweek-legacy93.html

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 2:03 am
by THAWA
The transmission

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 2:25 am
by Kelly
Really? they never came in a 5 speed oversears either?

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 2:31 am
by legacy92ej22t
I don't see a rear spoiler on there.

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 2:35 am
by Subaru_Nation555
legacy92ej22t wrote:I don't see a rear spoiler on there.
That's what I was thinking.

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 2:47 am
by THAWA
The rear spoiler wasn't standard.

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:07 am
by J-MoNeY
DOHC? Ba wha?

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:08 am
by THAWA
Oh nvm, I understand.

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:33 am
by AWD_addict
Subaru_Nation555 wrote:
legacy92ej22t wrote:I don't see a rear spoiler on there.
That's what I was thinking.
Me too. Maybe it's in the cargo area. :roll:

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:36 am
by Legacy777
yuck....two tone.

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:19 pm
by entirelyturbo
Shucks, nobody got this one...

I'll give a big hint:
* 1993 model

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:19 pm
by BAC5.2
Subaru's are AWD, not 4wd. It doesn't have a rear spoiler.

It also has an N/A Grille.

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:22 pm
by BAC5.2
subyluvr2212 wrote:Shucks, nobody got this one...

I'll give a big hint:
* 1993 model
Are you trying to say that the wheels don't correspond to the would-be 94 USDM Turbo Wheels? Because they did not get those in Japan. Or are you trying to say there was no 1993 GT wagon? Because there was in Japan.

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:24 pm
by entirelyturbo
There was a 93 GT wagon in Japan, but it didn't look like that ;)

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:30 pm
by BAC5.2
Are you sure about that? They went to the BE chassis in 94.

The only thing it's missing that I think should be there (or was optional) was the OEM lip spoiler kit.

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:33 pm
by entirelyturbo
Google "1993 Subaru GT wagon". You will see no BF-chassis cars, only BG's.

As best I know, the BC/BF chassis was 89-90 for prefacelift, and 91-92 for postfacelift in Japan.

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:34 pm
by BAC5.2

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:38 pm
by BAC5.2
A quick search: "October 1993: The second-generation Legacy debuts in Japan"

http://www.subaru.co.nz/Roam/About_Suba ... rticle=755

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:40 pm
by Legacy777
Second gen didn't come out until the 94 MY in Japan. It may have been released in 93, but it was a 94 MY.

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:41 pm
by BAC5.2
:)

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:56 pm
by entirelyturbo
Okay, I guess I'm wrong then.

:oops:

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:58 pm
by 91White-T
subyluvr2212 wrote:There was a 93 GT wagon in Japan, but it didn't look like that ;)
Yeah, 93 was the first year for the BD/G chassis in Japan. Thats probably a 92.

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:55 pm
by Tleg93
That was a good article.

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 11:46 pm
by BAC5.2
91White-T wrote:
subyluvr2212 wrote:There was a 93 GT wagon in Japan, but it didn't look like that ;)
Yeah, 93 was the first year for the BD/G chassis in Japan. Thats probably a 92.
No it wasn't. MY94 started the BD/BG.

Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 1:13 am
by THAWA
hmmm
subyluvr2212 wrote:Shucks, nobody got this one...

I'll give a big hint:
* 1993 model
Actually, we all noticed something you didn't :), tranny and spoiler.
BAC5.2 wrote:Subaru's are AWD, not 4wd. It doesn't have a rear spoiler.

It also has an N/A Grille.
Techincally it was still called Fulltime 4wd back when it was released ;)

And that's not an NA grill. It's definately the stock grill.
BAC5.2 wrote:Are you sure about that? They went to the BE chassis in 94.

The only thing it's missing that I think should be there (or was optional) was the OEM lip spoiler kit.
They went to the BE/BH chassis in 98.
Legacy777 wrote:Second gen didn't come out until the 94 MY in Japan. It may have been released in 93, but it was a 94 MY.
The Second gen definately came out in 93, and was released as a MY93. Japan didn't sell cars a year ahead like we did.

However, this car definately could be a 93, could've been produced in 1993, or could've been produced in 1991-1992 and sold in 1993. Wouldn't be the first time that happened. The problems with the ad are the transmission, and the spoiler.