legacycentral bbs

The only major issues with the cone filters is that you are sucking hot air
in the engine compartment, so if you can isolate the cone filter, that is
good. Second thing is that the more air can cause problems with the MAF
sensor over time, also make sure the intake is securely fastened, as the MAF
does not like vibrations, which can also lead to the MAF sensor failure.

josh

************************************
Josh Colombo
jcc189@psu.edu <mailto:jcc189@psu.edu>

"Life, an ever-changing melody
of beats and rhythm" - ME
************************************




-----Original Message-----
From: jason grahn [mailto:jgrahn555@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:49 PM
To: BC-BFLegacyWorks@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [BC-BFLegacyWorks] Pannel Vs Cone filter?


from Quin:
>So what are peoples sugestions. I'll have a Group N front down pipe
>soon, have a new performance rear muffler going on soon as well. Will
>also be looking to setup a manual boost control. So which would suit
>my needs?

You'll be able to get more out of the cone filter then the panel filter.
They usually flow more which leads to better tuning capabilities; another
bonus (depeneding on how you look at it) is the sound that it makes at wide
open throttle, very loud in comparison to the in-box filter..

Whatever you choose, it's still better then the factory paper element. good
luck!

-Jason

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


To unsubscribe from this group, please send an email to:
BC-BFLegacyWorks-unsubscribe@egroups.com








To unsubscribe from this group, please send an email to:
BC-BFLegacyWorks-unsubscribe@egroups.com