legacycentral bbs

I can actually answer a couple of these...

The 2.2 natually aspirated motor is open deck.
the 2.2 NA does NOT have the oil squirters.
Head's themselves are slightly different to allow more flow. Also, the price
on new ones is a lot more.

-Jason (with one of each, in their own seperate cars!)


>From: "Rod Grosvenor" <roderic@cableone.net>
>
>Hello--I have a couple of questions that maybe you can answer. You seem to
>know quite a bit about the 2.2T; can you tell me more about the `92 NA 2.2?
>Is it a closed-deck motor? Does it have the oil spray set-up similar to the
>turbo? Is the head configuration the same? Are the pistons forged or cast?
>Any other similarities/differences would be greatly appreciated. This info
>will help me decide which direction to go in when I build my next
>motor-(this will be after I catch up on what I need to know about
>street-built, hi-po turbo motors). Anyone else please feel free to send any
>info that applies, also. Thanks again---ROD (AZ.)



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


------------------------ ---------------------~-->

Monitoring Service trial
http://us.click.yahoo.com/MDsVHB/bQ8CAA ... /XoTolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, please send an email to:
BC-BFLegacyWorks-unsubscribe@egroups.com

I believe the very first year or so of the Legacy, the N/A 2.2 was closed deck. I am pretty sure my 90 is closed deck but not positive. It was manufactured in july of 89.

Not all of the 2.0's are closed deck. The older ones were, but the newer 2.0 is open deck along with the rest of subaru's newer motors. Are there any newer production motors that are closed deck?

Josh

-----Original Message-----
From: jason grahn
Sent: Fri 9/21/2001 1:55 PM
To: BC-BFLegacyWorks@yahoogroups.com
Cc:
Subject: [BC-BFLegacyWorks] Re:Re: 2.0 vs 2.2



I can actually answer a couple of these...

The 2.2 natually aspirated motor is open deck.
the 2.2 NA does NOT have the oil squirters.
Head's themselves are slightly different to allow more flow. Also, the price
on new ones is a lot more.

-Jason (with one of each, in their own seperate cars!)


>From: "Rod Grosvenor" <roderic@cableone.net>
>
>Hello--I have a couple of questions that maybe you can answer. You seem to
>know quite a bit about the 2.2T; can you tell me more about the `92 NA 2.2?
>Is it a closed-deck motor? Does it have the oil spray set-up similar to the
>turbo? Is the head configuration the same? Are the pistons forged or cast?
>Any other similarities/differences would be greatly appreciated. This info
>will help me decide which direction to go in when I build my next
>motor-(this will be after I catch up on what I need to know about
>street-built, hi-po turbo motors). Anyone else please feel free to send any
>info that applies, also. Thanks again---ROD (AZ.)



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


------------------------ ---------------------~-->

Monitoring Service trial
http://us.click.yahoo.com/MDsVHB/bQ8CAA ... /XoTolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, please send an email to:
BC-BFLegacyWorks-unsubscribe@egroups.com