I need new struts so I'm looking a upgrading, I think I've got the fitment down, going on a '91 SS so '02+ WRX/STI right?. I was looking for some STI take off struts/springs but the "clunk" issue kinda scared me off. I've got a line on some low mile KYB AGX struts but was wondering how much stiffer I should go with the springs. I'm looking to tighten up the ride without making it unpleasent for daily driving, I know describing ride and handling is a bit ambiguous, so as a gauge I would consider stock SS pretty soft.
Anyway, I understand that the stockers are 132F/132R and was thinking about 25%-30% stiffer should be about right, so around 170 lb/in. Anybody running a setup like this? thoughts?
Gary
Good spring rate for daily driver??
Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators
-
- Third Gear
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 5:14 pm
- Location: Thorp (Ellensburg), WA
- Contact:
Good spring rate for daily driver??
No matter how broke I am... I always seem to find two cents.
-
- Knowledgeable
- Posts: 2278
- Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 8:19 am
- Location: Saint Joe, CA - Redlands, CA
i have 150/160, and non-car-people passengers dont ask why my car is stiff. It's a remarkable difference from the stock stuff though. Been in a car with prodrives, and it is stiffer than mine, but still not harsh. That car was a bit underdamped. 210lb car ive driven was annoying on a choppy freeway- i was happy to get out. These all had about the same preload.
Having soft seats makes a big difference.
I think i listed the fitment issues with wrx stuff, and there are plenty of real experts that can help
Having soft seats makes a big difference.
I think i listed the fitment issues with wrx stuff, and there are plenty of real experts that can help
Last edited by scottzg on Fri Sep 02, 2005 12:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
[url=http://www.thawa.net/gallery/albums/album108/DSCF0330.jpg]90 legacy of awesomeness[/url]
For decades I've driven cars set up too stiffly and am not going to do it with this project. Standard spring rates on the
twgn are about right. Paricularly with whiteline bars,links
and bushings. Stiffer roll control with 20 front and the
adjustable 20-22-24 on the rear is very good.
The next step will be the same rate DMS double-progressive
springs with Tein adjustable dampers.
The result will be a compliant ride with plenty of dialed-in
stiffness when needed.
twgn are about right. Paricularly with whiteline bars,links
and bushings. Stiffer roll control with 20 front and the
adjustable 20-22-24 on the rear is very good.
The next step will be the same rate DMS double-progressive
springs with Tein adjustable dampers.
The result will be a compliant ride with plenty of dialed-in
stiffness when needed.
Subtle (normally aspirated engines suck):
05 Legacy GT Wagon with Cobb chip.
62 Alfa Romeo Spider- had a 1.6 L with 80 hp, now 2 L with 160 torque. Curb weight 2050 lbs.
93 Leg Twgn fmic, vf34, etc. ((sold))
05 Legacy GT Wagon with Cobb chip.
62 Alfa Romeo Spider- had a 1.6 L with 80 hp, now 2 L with 160 torque. Curb weight 2050 lbs.
93 Leg Twgn fmic, vf34, etc. ((sold))
In reading Greg's question below, the DMS springs are available in standard ride height.
The double-progressive means that the final coils --top
and bottom are of thinner stock which provides some
compliance that helps when rallying on gravel
The double-progressive means that the final coils --top
and bottom are of thinner stock which provides some
compliance that helps when rallying on gravel
Subtle (normally aspirated engines suck):
05 Legacy GT Wagon with Cobb chip.
62 Alfa Romeo Spider- had a 1.6 L with 80 hp, now 2 L with 160 torque. Curb weight 2050 lbs.
93 Leg Twgn fmic, vf34, etc. ((sold))
05 Legacy GT Wagon with Cobb chip.
62 Alfa Romeo Spider- had a 1.6 L with 80 hp, now 2 L with 160 torque. Curb weight 2050 lbs.
93 Leg Twgn fmic, vf34, etc. ((sold))