HID's?

Headlights to tailights and everything in between.

Moderators: Helpinators, Moderators

Post Reply
LookAsubie
First Gear
Posts: 198
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 11:28 am
Location: Clatskanie, Or

HID's?

Post by LookAsubie »

Ok, i really want to get a set of HID's for my car but i havent seen many turbo legacies with them.

i have the EDM glass headlights. do i have to do anything to make them fit/work? or will they fit right in and work fine?

i have heard about the pattern being all screwed up, but my beam pattern is already kinda screwed up so im not really worried about that.

anyways, can any give me some recoomendations? which are good, which ones to stay away from?

and if you have any pics of them on your car please post.

any help is appreciated. thanks.
1992 legacy SS 5mt, Winestone Metallic.
555BCTurbo
Knowledgeable
Knowledgeable
Posts: 3335
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:40 pm
Location: Oregon

Post by 555BCTurbo »

The main concern is blinding the other drivers...

So don't do it...



btw...I live in Svensen...not far from you
Nick

1987 Audi 4000CS quattro...soon to be 20VT
1994 Dodge Ram 2500 4x4 CTD, #11 plate, 30 psi, Scotty II intake, 4" exhaust
LookAsubie
First Gear
Posts: 198
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 11:28 am
Location: Clatskanie, Or

Post by LookAsubie »

nice, gimme a wave if you see me sometime.
1992 legacy SS 5mt, Winestone Metallic.
fishbone79
Second Gear
Posts: 502
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 3:14 am
Location: Armpit, USA

Post by fishbone79 »

If installed and used correctly they won't blind anyone any more than normal lights will.

I had a set of Osram's converted from an older Audi for a while, they were 5000k and a bit too blueish for me. If I were to do it again, I would probably get something in the 4000k range. However, I've since switched back to halogen, the light quality (note, not the quantity) is superior.

I am unbelievably happy with my Silverstar bulbs - no conversion necessary and the light quality and quantity is awesome. They are not the cheap "HID lookalike" bulbs (they really don't look like HID's), but they do run at a higher wattage (75W vs. 50w oem). The set I have has been in for 4 years with no "early burnout" issues - and I tend to leave my lights on ~70% of the time. I did get the higher-end silverstars though.
Cheers,
morgan

1992 Legacy BF
1946 Ford 1.5 Ton Truck (The Beast): http://community.webshots.com/user/fishbone79
Buffman
Second Gear
Posts: 501
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 1:59 am
Location: MI

Post by Buffman »

fishbone79 wrote:If installed and used correctly they won't blind anyone any more than normal lights will.

I had a set of Osram's converted from an older Audi for a while, they were 5000k and a bit too blueish for me. If I were to do it again, I would probably get something in the 4000k range. However, I've since switched back to halogen, the light quality (note, not the quantity) is superior.

I am unbelievably happy with my Silverstar bulbs - no conversion necessary and the light quality and quantity is awesome. They are not the cheap "HID lookalike" bulbs (they really don't look like HID's), but they do run at a higher wattage (75W vs. 50w oem). The set I have has been in for 4 years with no "early burnout" issues - and I tend to leave my lights on ~70% of the time. I did get the higher-end silverstars though.
the silverstars don't put out anymore light than a stock bulb. sorry. Perhaps maybe the Ultras do if they're rated at 70watts, but unless you increase wattage you're not getting any more lumens.
1992 Legacy LS Special Wagon..
fishbone79
Second Gear
Posts: 502
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 3:14 am
Location: Armpit, USA

Post by fishbone79 »

Buffman wrote:
fishbone79 wrote: ....but they do run at a higher wattage (75W vs. 50w oem).
the silverstars don't put out anymore light than a stock bulb. sorry. Perhaps maybe the Ultras do if they're rated at 70watts, but unless you increase wattage you're not getting any more lumens.

I've actually compared the luminosity between the two using the inverse square law with a null-photometer (I work in a geology lab), they are roughly 40% brighter (i.e. 40% more lumens), whereas the HID's were ~90% brighter. The light quality is far superior to OEM, and much easier on the eyes than the HID's were. Normal silverstars are not brighter, they just put out light in a different band (supposedly closer to white); these actually increase the amount of light. I was a bit disappointed that 50w vs 75w was such a small increase, but I understand that the relationship is non-linear. I have the actual data somewhere if you're interested.
Cheers,
morgan

1992 Legacy BF
1946 Ford 1.5 Ton Truck (The Beast): http://community.webshots.com/user/fishbone79
LookAsubie
First Gear
Posts: 198
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 11:28 am
Location: Clatskanie, Or

Post by LookAsubie »

fishbone79 wrote:If installed and used correctly they won't blind anyone any more than normal lights will.

I had a set of Osram's converted from an older Audi for a while, they were 5000k and a bit too blueish for me. If I were to do it again, I would probably get something in the 4000k range. However, I've since switched back to halogen, the light quality (note, not the quantity) is superior.

I am unbelievably happy with my Silverstar bulbs - no conversion necessary and the light quality and quantity is awesome. They are not the cheap "HID lookalike" bulbs (they really don't look like HID's), but they do run at a higher wattage (75W vs. 50w oem). The set I have has been in for 4 years with no "early burnout" issues - and I tend to leave my lights on ~70% of the time. I did get the higher-end silverstars though.
1992 legacy SS 5mt, Winestone Metallic.
Buffman
Second Gear
Posts: 501
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 1:59 am
Location: MI

Post by Buffman »

fishbone79 wrote:
Buffman wrote:
fishbone79 wrote: ....but they do run at a higher wattage (75W vs. 50w oem).
the silverstars don't put out anymore light than a stock bulb. sorry. Perhaps maybe the Ultras do if they're rated at 70watts, but unless you increase wattage you're not getting any more lumens.

I've actually compared the luminosity between the two using the inverse square law with a null-photometer (I work in a geology lab), they are roughly 40% brighter (i.e. 40% more lumens), whereas the HID's were ~90% brighter. The light quality is far superior to OEM, and much easier on the eyes than the HID's were. Normal silverstars are not brighter, they just put out light in a different band (supposedly closer to white); these actually increase the amount of light. I was a bit disappointed that 50w vs 75w was such a small increase, but I understand that the relationship is non-linear. I have the actual data somewhere if you're interested.
good to know. Like I said I can't find any ratings for the SSU, so it's good to know they are actually brighter and not just claimed brighter as the normal SS are.
1992 Legacy LS Special Wagon..
fishbone79
Second Gear
Posts: 502
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 3:14 am
Location: Armpit, USA

Post by fishbone79 »

Yeah, I tried the regular silverstar bulbs and, while I could see better, they were not actually brighter. The light quality is better because of the shorter wavelength.... but not enough to warrant $18/bulb. The ultras, or whatever they are called, are awesome though.
Cheers,
morgan

1992 Legacy BF
1946 Ford 1.5 Ton Truck (The Beast): http://community.webshots.com/user/fishbone79
Post Reply