I have DSL!!!
Moderator: Moderators
xp's firewall is really not that bad, and would work.
The funny thing is, even when michael had his computer hooked up to the modem, his ip was still an internal ip address.
When he connected to my server, it gave an external IP, but it was not back traceable to his machine. So I have a funny feeling they are already doing a NAT on his connection.
...and doing it again is probably freaking the router out. I did notice they mention that only certain routers work.
Michael, you might want to call them up and ask them, what exactly is your connection type, PPOE, tcp/ip, or are they using NAT?
That would probably help us identify what exactly the problem is.
The funny thing is, even when michael had his computer hooked up to the modem, his ip was still an internal ip address.
When he connected to my server, it gave an external IP, but it was not back traceable to his machine. So I have a funny feeling they are already doing a NAT on his connection.
...and doing it again is probably freaking the router out. I did notice they mention that only certain routers work.
Michael, you might want to call them up and ask them, what exactly is your connection type, PPOE, tcp/ip, or are they using NAT?
That would probably help us identify what exactly the problem is.
Josh
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
-
- Vikash
- Posts: 12517
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
- Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
- Contact:
When his computer was connected to the modem but had an internal address, was the DSL internet connection actually working?
One thing to try with the router is tell it to use a different subnet. If the DSL provider is using 192.168.0.0, maybe try using 10.0.0.0 (which is what I usually use).
One thing to try with the router is tell it to use a different subnet. If the DSL provider is using 192.168.0.0, maybe try using 10.0.0.0 (which is what I usually use).
"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
-
- quasi-mod-o
- Posts: 6000
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 7:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL
Okay, so I need to call Bellsouth and find out what type of connection I'm on, as in PPPoE, TCP/IP, NAT, whatever.
Also, another opinion I gathered from someone. He said the fact that I'm using XP Home Edition is automatically making things very difficult, as Home Edition is supposedly "non-networkable." So the router is really not agreeing with XP. I could do it, but it would be a royal PITA. Has anyone else heard this?
Also, I tried putting my username and password into the router settings today, but it didn't work. I'm curious if I might hafta enter a connection name, host name, and domain name like it asks for, which I have no idea what those are.
Josh, my modem's IP is 192.168.1.254 and what happens when I type that into my address bar in IE, that brings me to the modem setup page just like the router. If you're not already logged in, you will have to enter the username and password into those modem settings, and then it will connect to the Internet.
Also, another opinion I gathered from someone. He said the fact that I'm using XP Home Edition is automatically making things very difficult, as Home Edition is supposedly "non-networkable." So the router is really not agreeing with XP. I could do it, but it would be a royal PITA. Has anyone else heard this?
Also, I tried putting my username and password into the router settings today, but it didn't work. I'm curious if I might hafta enter a connection name, host name, and domain name like it asks for, which I have no idea what those are.
Josh, my modem's IP is 192.168.1.254 and what happens when I type that into my address bar in IE, that brings me to the modem setup page just like the router. If you're not already logged in, you will have to enter the username and password into those modem settings, and then it will connect to the Internet.
-
- Vikash
- Posts: 12517
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
- Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
- Contact:
Hmm.
Okay.
So you need to connect to the modem with a web browser in order to log in.
So maybe the communication between the modem and your computer is not PPPoE?
Okay.
Hmm.
So you need a router that doesn't care if the "WAN" is a private network. Hopefully your router is dumb enough. This is probably where BellSouth's idea that only some routers can be used with their DSL comes from.
And you need a router that can use a different private network for its "LAN."
And you need your computer to be willing to route through the router to get to a private address.
Sooooo..... This is what the kind of thing I think you should do. See if this makes sense to you (I'm kind of basing this on Linksys' EtherFast Router manual on their web site, which I know doesn't quite match what you have):
- Plug the router in without connecting it to the DSL modem, and restart your computer.
- Use Internet Explorer to access the router's configuration page (probably something like going to http://192.168.1.1/).
- Set the LAN IP address of the router to 10.0.0.1
- Set the LAN subnet mask of the router to 255.255.255.0
- Set the WAN IP of the router to be automatically/dynamically assigned.
- Commit the changes. The router will probably need to be restarted, and so will your computer. If it worked, you'll now be able to access the router's configuration with IE using the address http://10.0.0.1/
- Okay. Now hook up the DSL modem, and restart the router. Then go to the router's configuration with IE. Hopefully it should show a WAN IP address of 192.168.1.something.
- Now.... Open up a command prompt in XP, and try typing this command:
- Now see if going to http://192.168.1.254/ in IE gives you the DSL modem login page. If it does, then you should be able to log in and then surf the information superhighway at broadband speed with the protection of the router. I think.
Okay.
So you need to connect to the modem with a web browser in order to log in.
So maybe the communication between the modem and your computer is not PPPoE?
Okay.
Hmm.
So you need a router that doesn't care if the "WAN" is a private network. Hopefully your router is dumb enough. This is probably where BellSouth's idea that only some routers can be used with their DSL comes from.
And you need a router that can use a different private network for its "LAN."
And you need your computer to be willing to route through the router to get to a private address.
Sooooo..... This is what the kind of thing I think you should do. See if this makes sense to you (I'm kind of basing this on Linksys' EtherFast Router manual on their web site, which I know doesn't quite match what you have):
- Plug the router in without connecting it to the DSL modem, and restart your computer.
- Use Internet Explorer to access the router's configuration page (probably something like going to http://192.168.1.1/).
- Set the LAN IP address of the router to 10.0.0.1
- Set the LAN subnet mask of the router to 255.255.255.0
- Set the WAN IP of the router to be automatically/dynamically assigned.
- Commit the changes. The router will probably need to be restarted, and so will your computer. If it worked, you'll now be able to access the router's configuration with IE using the address http://10.0.0.1/
- Okay. Now hook up the DSL modem, and restart the router. Then go to the router's configuration with IE. Hopefully it should show a WAN IP address of 192.168.1.something.
- Now.... Open up a command prompt in XP, and try typing this command:
Code: Select all
route add 192.168.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1
"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
What vikash has typed up sounds like a good solution, and definitley worth a try.
Vikash, what exactly does tweaking the routing table do? I haven't played with routing tables too much. Will he have to run this every time he reboots his computer? Any tech/geek explanation would be great
Michael,
Winxp home is networkable, however it can only do peer-to-peer networking if I remember correctly. I beta tested home edition in the early stages when they implemented this. I found out what they were doing, got pissed off, and didn't really participate too much in the beta.
Vikash, what exactly does tweaking the routing table do? I haven't played with routing tables too much. Will he have to run this every time he reboots his computer? Any tech/geek explanation would be great

Michael,
Winxp home is networkable, however it can only do peer-to-peer networking if I remember correctly. I beta tested home edition in the early stages when they implemented this. I found out what they were doing, got pissed off, and didn't really participate too much in the beta.
Josh
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
-
- quasi-mod-o
- Posts: 6000
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 7:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL
Vikash, I will try all that, but just so you know, I have never seen the letters "WAN" in the router setting page anywhere. Maybe I'm looking in the wrong place, I dunno.
But there is a drop-down menu at the top of the Setup page that has these 7 options in it:
-Obtain an IP automatically
-Static IP
-PPPoE
-RAS
-PPTP
-Heart Beat Signal
-L2TP
I'm presuming that when you want me to set the WAN IP of the router to a dynamic IP, you want me to set this drop-down menu to Obtain automatically. Is that correct?
Josh, in that case, the next computer I buy will probably just be an XP Pro computer (or whatever professional/business OS they have by then). Is the XP machine you were working with before a Home or Pro? And what do you use as your main computer (for an OS)?
But there is a drop-down menu at the top of the Setup page that has these 7 options in it:
-Obtain an IP automatically
-Static IP
-PPPoE
-RAS
-PPTP
-Heart Beat Signal
-L2TP
I'm presuming that when you want me to set the WAN IP of the router to a dynamic IP, you want me to set this drop-down menu to Obtain automatically. Is that correct?
Josh, in that case, the next computer I buy will probably just be an XP Pro computer (or whatever professional/business OS they have by then). Is the XP machine you were working with before a Home or Pro? And what do you use as your main computer (for an OS)?
yeah set the list to obtain an ip automatically
the xp machine I was talking about is pro.
I use 2000 as my main OS.
My laptop has it on there, server is 2000, my desktop is dual boot between 2000 & xp pro (this is probably going to get reformatted and win2003 server loaded to do testing with exchange 2003 & upgrading my server) I also have a test machine which has two separate partitions of xp pro.....and finally one lonely old 200 mhz nt 4 server which never runs
the xp machine I was talking about is pro.
I use 2000 as my main OS.
My laptop has it on there, server is 2000, my desktop is dual boot between 2000 & xp pro (this is probably going to get reformatted and win2003 server loaded to do testing with exchange 2003 & upgrading my server) I also have a test machine which has two separate partitions of xp pro.....and finally one lonely old 200 mhz nt 4 server which never runs

Josh
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
-
- Vikash
- Posts: 12517
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
- Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
- Contact:
Oh yeah, I left that out... If the route command is necessary it will have to be run every time the computer starts up. I would expect that XP would have some way to automate that, or even to just statically modify the routing tables, but I don't know how.
Actually, Michael, try it without the route command first, and then if it doesn't work, type in the route command and then try it.
Most consumer "routers" I've seen call the external interface "WAN" and the local one "LAN." So, yeah, I think what I'm saying is tell it to obtain an external IP automatically.
Josh - I'll write a quick explanation of routing tables in another response, so that the above can get posted as soon as possible.
Actually, Michael, try it without the route command first, and then if it doesn't work, type in the route command and then try it.
Most consumer "routers" I've seen call the external interface "WAN" and the local one "LAN." So, yeah, I think what I'm saying is tell it to obtain an external IP automatically.
Josh - I'll write a quick explanation of routing tables in another response, so that the above can get posted as soon as possible.

"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
-
- Vikash
- Posts: 12517
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
- Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
- Contact:
Routing tables just tell your TCP/IP stack how to route packets. Each entry basically consists of a network address and either a router address or an interface.
For example, let's see how Michael's computer (if the router were working) would figure out how to send a packet to your web server. This may not be exactly right, but it'll give you some idea:
It would know it needs to send the packet to surrealmirage.com (69.73.171.5).
It would see if it could find a routing entry whose network address matches. It'd find the default route, which matches any address. That entry would say to route it through the DSL modem, 192.168.1.254.
So then it would look for an entry telling it how to send to that address. It would find the route he added by hand, that says to get to 192.168.1.anything, route it through the router, 10.0.0.1.
Then it would look for an entry on that, and it would find one saying to get to 10.0.0.anything, go through the ethernet interface.
Now that's gotten all the way to an interface, it'll just send the packet out that interface.
Type "route print" at a command prompt sometime to see all your routing table entries.
For example, let's see how Michael's computer (if the router were working) would figure out how to send a packet to your web server. This may not be exactly right, but it'll give you some idea:
It would know it needs to send the packet to surrealmirage.com (69.73.171.5).
It would see if it could find a routing entry whose network address matches. It'd find the default route, which matches any address. That entry would say to route it through the DSL modem, 192.168.1.254.
So then it would look for an entry telling it how to send to that address. It would find the route he added by hand, that says to get to 192.168.1.anything, route it through the router, 10.0.0.1.
Then it would look for an entry on that, and it would find one saying to get to 10.0.0.anything, go through the ethernet interface.
Now that's gotten all the way to an interface, it'll just send the packet out that interface.
Type "route print" at a command prompt sometime to see all your routing table entries.
"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
Just use -p so, route add "insert route" -p makes it permanentvrg3 wrote:Oh yeah, I left that out... If the route command is necessary it will have to be run every time the computer starts up. I would expect that XP would have some way to automate that, or even to just statically modify the routing tables, but I don't know how.
08 GE - SWP
96 BG - SGP
96 CX - EBP
96 BG - SGP
96 CX - EBP
Hmm.....I think the whole process may be a little more complicated....but yeah I think that gives me an idea.
This is my routing table
I guess the 192.168.1.0 is the default route correct?
If you look at my default route
It's basically pointing back at itself. If we look at what you told michael to do, it would be changing the gateway for that default route to be the router instead of the local IP. Correct?
yeah -p can be used to make the route persistant.
This is my routing table
Code: Select all
===========================================================================
Interface List
0x1 ........................... MS TCP Loopback interface
0x1000003 ...00 20 e0 66 30 9f ...... Intel 8255x-based Integrated Fast Ethernet
===========================================================================
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.3 192.168.1.10 1
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.10 192.168.1.10 1
192.168.1.10 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.10 192.168.1.10 1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.1.10 192.168.1.10 1
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.10 192.168.1.10 1
Default Gateway: 192.168.1.3
===========================================================================
Persistent Routes:
None
If you look at my default route
Code: Select all
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.10 192.168.1.10 1
yeah -p can be used to make the route persistant.
Josh
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
-
- Vikash
- Posts: 12517
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
- Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
- Contact:
Yes, it's a little more complicated than that, but those are the basics.
Your default route is the first line:
A netmask of 0.0.0.0 matches any address, regardless of what the network address is. So your default route is to route through 192.168.1.3.
The line you're referring to:
Is saying that to get to 192.168.1.x, go through 192.168.1.10. That seems weird to me...
You have this route:
That says to get to 192.168.1.10 you use 127.0.0.1 as the gateway... 127.0.0.1 is the local address on the loopback interface (a virtual network that contains no computer other than your own). This is kind of weird.
Is this part of some Windows XP firewall thing that I don't understand?
What I told Michael he might need is an explicit route saying to get to 192.168.1.x it should route through the router. Ordinarily, most systems I've dealt with don't include private IP address ranges when looking at the default route. That makes sense if you think about it; if you try to connect to a private IP address on a network that your computer's not on, it should fail.
Your default route is the first line:
Code: Select all
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.3 192.168.1.10 1
The line you're referring to:
Code: Select all
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.10 192.168.1.10 1
You have this route:
Code: Select all
192.168.1.10 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
Is this part of some Windows XP firewall thing that I don't understand?
What I told Michael he might need is an explicit route saying to get to 192.168.1.x it should route through the router. Ordinarily, most systems I've dealt with don't include private IP address ranges when looking at the default route. That makes sense if you think about it; if you try to connect to a private IP address on a network that your computer's not on, it should fail.
"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
-
- quasi-mod-o
- Posts: 6000
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 7:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL
Vikash, I want to resurrect the "Vikash is a god" thread for you!
Your instructions you posted earlier today worked! I got the router to work! I had to use the command you said though, it didn't work without it.
Now what were you saying about me having to login everytime I start my computer? That's not a big deal, I'm willing to do that, but what should I have to login with?
But anyway thanks for the help guys!
Your instructions you posted earlier today worked! I got the router to work! I had to use the command you said though, it didn't work without it.
Now what were you saying about me having to login everytime I start my computer? That's not a big deal, I'm willing to do that, but what should I have to login with?
But anyway thanks for the help guys!
-
- quasi-mod-o
- Posts: 6000
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 7:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL
-
- Vikash
- Posts: 12517
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
- Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
- Contact:

Awesome. Awesome to the max.
Now, reboot your computer, and open up a command prompt window, and type this:
Code: Select all
route add 192.168.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 -p
You should only need to log in to the DSL modem (via IE) the one time you did, since the router will maintain the connection. So unless you have a power outage or have to unplug the router or modem, you shouldn't need to do anything to get online. Hopefully.
"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
This is on a windows 2000 machine, not XP, and has nothing to do with any firewall thing.
It may just be how MS deals with the routing tables and such....I don't know.
Here's the routing table from my computer at work. Same basic layout
You know what I just thought of......the router has it's on routing table you can configure. He might be able to tweak things in there.
Michael, glad to hear it works. Check your routing table and see if you have any perisistant routes that refer to what you typed in. That's probably why you can just boot it up and have everything work.
It may just be how MS deals with the routing tables and such....I don't know.
Here's the routing table from my computer at work. Same basic layout
Code: Select all
===========================================================================
Interface List
0x1 ........................... MS TCP Loopback interface
0x1000003 ...00 04 76 41 57 8c ...... 3Com 10/100 Mini PCI Ethernet Adapter
0x1000004 ...00 c0 4f f8 20 57 ...... 3Com 3C90x Ethernet Adapter
===========================================================================
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.31.10.251 172.31.10.146 1
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
172.31.10.0 255.255.255.0 172.31.10.146 172.31.10.146 1
172.31.10.146 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
172.31.255.255 255.255.255.255 172.31.10.146 172.31.10.146 1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 172.31.10.146 172.31.10.146 1
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 172.31.10.146 1000003 1
Default Gateway: 172.31.10.251
===========================================================================
Persistent Routes:
None
You know what I just thought of......the router has it's on routing table you can configure. He might be able to tweak things in there.
Michael, glad to hear it works. Check your routing table and see if you have any perisistant routes that refer to what you typed in. That's probably why you can just boot it up and have everything work.
Josh
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
surrealmirage.com/subaru
1990 Legacy (AWD, 6MT, & EJ22T Swap)
2020 Outback Limted XT
If you need to get a hold of me please email me rather then pm
-
- Vikash
- Posts: 12517
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
- Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
- Contact:
That is weird. So the computer's acting as a router at all times, routing its own packets through itself?
Michael doesn't need to tweak any routing tables except for adding that one entry that tells his computer it's okay to try to contact 192.168.1.0 as an external network.
Michael doesn't need to tweak any routing tables except for adding that one entry that tells his computer it's okay to try to contact 192.168.1.0 as an external network.
"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
-
- quasi-mod-o
- Posts: 6000
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 7:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL
Okay, two other questions folks:
1) Let's say I have a cheap-ass friend who wants to steal my bandwidth instead of getting his own DSL connection
. Can he literally plug-and-play into another port in the router, or does he have to go through a similar setup procedure?
2) I can't seem to use WinMX. When I switched over to the primary connection for DSL instead of the secondary for dial-up, it asked for TCP and UDP numbers. I put the ones I had in, but it doesn't seem to work, since I searched something obvious like Britney Spears and nothing came up. Even if something does come up, I can't DL it. Any ideas?
Thanks for the continued help
Edit: He plugged-and-played, the jerkoff! Wish it was that easy
1) Let's say I have a cheap-ass friend who wants to steal my bandwidth instead of getting his own DSL connection

2) I can't seem to use WinMX. When I switched over to the primary connection for DSL instead of the secondary for dial-up, it asked for TCP and UDP numbers. I put the ones I had in, but it doesn't seem to work, since I searched something obvious like Britney Spears and nothing came up. Even if something does come up, I can't DL it. Any ideas?
Thanks for the continued help

Edit: He plugged-and-played, the jerkoff! Wish it was that easy

-
- Vikash
- Posts: 12517
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:13 am
- Location: USA, OH, Cleveland (sometimes visiting DC though)
- Contact:
Yeah, new connections would work but depending on the system it might be necessary to add an entry to the routing table.
Josh said you seemed to be behind a firewall at BellSouth, so you might not be able to poke holes in the firewall for WinMX. You might have to put it in the "firewalled with no way to accept incoming connections" mode.
Josh said you seemed to be behind a firewall at BellSouth, so you might not be able to poke holes in the firewall for WinMX. You might have to put it in the "firewalled with no way to accept incoming connections" mode.
"Just reading vrg3's convoluted, information-packed posts made me feel better all over again." -- subyluvr2212
-
- quasi-mod-o
- Posts: 6000
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 7:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL
-
- quasi-mod-o
- Posts: 6000
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 7:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL
-
- quasi-mod-o
- Posts: 6000
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 7:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL